14 chapters · Bear/Connors/Paradiso + Purves NCBI Bookshelf + MIT OCW 9.01 (taught by Bear)

Neuroscience — Textbook Reader

Detailed scaffolding from Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain (Bear) and Purves NCBI Bookshelf edition. Each chapter pairs with the matching MIT OCW 9.01 lecture (taught by Mark Bear, the textbook author). Chivero's neuroinflammation focus highlighted in the Glia chapter.

Ch 1 Brain Anatomy Ch 2 Neurons + Glia Ch 3 Membrane Potential Ch 4 Action Potential Ch 5 Synaptic Transmission Ch 6 Neurotransmitters Ch 7 Somatosensory Ch 8 Pain Ch 9 Vision Ch 10 Audition + Vestibular Ch 11 Chemical Senses Ch 12 Motor Systems Ch 13 Glia + Neuroinflammation (Chivero) Ch 14 Pharmacology + Methods

Ch 3Resting Membrane Potential

Big idea. Neurons rest at ~−65 mV — a charge separation that stores potential energy for signaling. Three forces produce it: ion concentration gradients (Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase), selective permeability (mostly K⁺ leak channels), and the resulting electrical force.

Ion concentrations (typical mammalian neuron):

The Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase maintains these gradients — pumps 3 Na⁺ out + 2 K⁺ in per ATP. Net export of one positive charge per cycle = electrogenic, contributes ~−5 to −10 mV directly. Without this pump, gradients would equilibrate within minutes.

The Nernst equation calculates equilibrium potential for ONE ion based on concentration gradient:

E_ion = (RT/zF) ln([ion]_outside / [ion]_inside)

At 37 °C: E_K ≈ −85 mV, E_Na ≈ +60 mV, E_Cl ≈ −65 mV, E_Ca ≈ +120 mV.

The Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) equation extends Nernst to multiple ions weighted by permeability:

V_m = (RT/F) ln[(P_K[K]_o + P_Na[Na]_o + P_Cl[Cl]_i) / (P_K[K]_i + P_Na[Na]_i + P_Cl[Cl]_o)]

Why is V_rest close to E_K? At rest, the membrane has many open K⁺ leak channels + few open Na⁺ channels. K⁺ permeability dominates, so V_m drifts toward E_K. Real V_rest ~−65 mV is slightly more positive than E_K because of small but non-zero Na⁺ leak.

resting membrane potentialion gradientsNa/K-ATPaseK⁺ leak channelNernst equationGHK equationequilibrium potentialelectrogenic pumpDonnan equilibriumKir channel

Ch 4The Action Potential

Big idea. The action potential is an all-or-none, regenerative ~100 mV depolarization driven by voltage-gated Na⁺ + K⁺ channels. Hodgkin + Huxley (1952 Nobel) worked out the kinetics in squid giant axon.
AP phases (mammalian neuron, ~1-2 ms total):
  1. Threshold (~−55 mV): Na_v opening exceeds K leak → positive feedback → commitment.
  2. Rising phase: rapid Na⁺ influx → V_m rises toward E_Na (+60 mV). Net inward current.
  3. Overshoot: peaks ~+30 to +40 mV (doesn't quite reach E_Na due to delayed K⁺ activation).
  4. Falling phase: Na_v inactivates (ball-and-chain blocks pore) + delayed-rectifier K⁺ channels open → K⁺ efflux → repolarization.
  5. Afterhyperpolarization (AHP): K⁺ channels still open beyond rest → V_m undershoots E_K briefly.
  6. Recovery: K⁺ channels close, Na_v de-inactivates (returns to closed-resting state). Ready for next AP.

Voltage-gated Na⁺ channel — three states:

Inactivation explains the absolute refractory period (~1 ms): no AP possible regardless of stimulus while Na_v is inactivated. The relative refractory period (~2-4 ms) follows: some Na_v de-inactivated but K⁺ channels still open + AHP — stronger stimulus needed.

Voltage-gated K⁺ channel (delayed rectifier): activates more slowly than Na_v, NO fast inactivation, repolarizes. Tetraethylammonium (TEA) blocks K⁺ channels.

Saltatory conduction in myelinated axons: AP "jumps" between unmyelinated nodes of Ranvier. Myelin (oligodendrocytes in CNS, Schwann cells in PNS) increases membrane resistance + reduces capacitance → AP regenerates only at nodes where Na_v is densely clustered. ~10-50× faster than continuous conduction in unmyelinated axons of same diameter. Demyelination (MS, Guillain-Barré) → conduction failure.

Pharmacology: Tetrodotoxin (TTX) from pufferfish blocks Na_v from outside → no AP. Saxitoxin (red tide dinoflagellates) similar. Local anesthetics (lidocaine, novocaine) block Na_v from inside (use-dependent block of firing axons).

action potentialthresholdNa_v 3 statesK_v delayed rectifierovershootAHPabsolute refractoryrelative refractoryHodgkin-Huxleysquid giant axonsaltatory conductionnodes of RanvierTTXlocal anesthetic

Ch 5Synaptic Transmission

Big idea. Synapses transform electrical signals into chemical signals + back. Vesicle fusion at the active zone is triggered by Ca²⁺ binding to synaptotagmin. Postsynaptic receptors transduce ligand binding into either fast ion flux (ionotropic) or slower G-protein signaling (metabotropic).

Electrical synapses: gap junctions (connexons) between cells. Bidirectional, fast, no synaptic delay. Coupling for synchronized firing in some networks (inferior olive).

Chemical synaptic transmission — sequence:
  1. AP arrives at axon terminal, depolarizes membrane.
  2. Voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels (Cav2.1, Cav2.2) open.
  3. Ca²⁺ enters terminal (rises from ~100 nM to ~50-100 μM in microdomains).
  4. Ca²⁺ binds C2 domains of synaptotagmin (vesicle Ca²⁺ sensor).
  5. Triggers conformational change in already-assembled SNARE complex: v-SNARE synaptobrevin (VAMP) + t-SNAREs syntaxin + SNAP-25 in 4-helix bundle.
  6. Membranes pulled into apposition; fusion pore opens.
  7. NT released into 20-50 nm cleft.
  8. NT diffuses to postsynaptic receptors.
  9. Receptors gate ions (ionotropic, ms timescale) or activate G proteins (metabotropic, seconds).
  10. Termination: reuptake by transporters (DAT, SERT, NET, GAT, EAAT), enzymatic breakdown (AChE for ACh), or diffusion.
  11. Vesicles recycled via clathrin endocytosis. NSF + α-SNAP disassemble SNAREs (ATP-dependent) for reuse.

Quantal release (Katz, Miledi 1965): NT is released in fixed packets ("quanta") corresponding to single vesicles. EPSP amplitude histogram is multi-peaked at integer multiples of unitary EPSP.

EPSP (excitatory postsynaptic potential): depolarizing — typically glutamate at AMPA/NMDA receptors → Na⁺ + K⁺ influx (and Ca²⁺ for NMDA). IPSP (inhibitory postsynaptic potential): hyperpolarizing — typically GABA at GABA_A → Cl⁻ influx, or activation of GIRK K⁺ channels via GABA_B/Gβγ.

Spatial summation: multiple synapses simultaneously sum at soma. Temporal summation: rapid repeated input from one synapse sums before previous EPSP decays. Both push V_m toward AP threshold at the axon hillock.

NMDA receptor — coincidence detector:

NMDA requires BOTH glutamate binding AND postsynaptic depolarization to flux ions:
  1. At rest, Mg²⁺ blocks the NMDA pore.
  2. Glutamate alone → no current (Mg²⁺ blocks).
  3. Depolarization (e.g., from AMPA + temporal summation) → expels Mg²⁺.
  4. Now glutamate + open NMDA → Ca²⁺ + Na⁺ influx.
  5. "Coincidence" of pre + post activity = Hebbian "fire together, wire together."
  6. Glycine (or D-serine) is a co-agonist required at the NMDA glycine site.

LTP at hippocampal CA1 (Bliss + Lomo 1973): tetanic stimulation produces sustained synaptic strengthening lasting hours-days. NMDA-dependent: tetanus → AMPA depolarizes postsynaptic cell → Mg²⁺ unblock → NMDA Ca²⁺ influx → CaMKII activates → AMPA receptor insertion + phosphorylation → larger EPSP for same glutamate. Cellular substrate of declarative memory.

LTD: opposite — modest Ca²⁺ rise → phosphatases (PP1, PP2A) → AMPA internalization. Required for forgetting + circuit refinement.

electrical vs chemical synapseSNARE complexsynaptobrevin/syntaxin/SNAP-25synaptotagminCa²⁺ triggerEPSPIPSPspatial summationtemporal summationquantal releaseNMDA coincidence detectorMg²⁺ blockLTPCaMKIIAMPA insertionLTD

Ch 13Glia + Neuroinflammation — CHIVERO FOCUS

Big idea. The "other half" of the brain — glial cells — outnumber or rival neurons in number and shape almost every aspect of neural function. Microglia are CNS immune cells; their activation drives neuroinflammation in HIV, methamphetamine exposure, and neurodegeneration. Chivero's lab investigates microglial NLRP3 inflammasome activation by HIV-Tat + meth.

Four glial cell types in CNS:

Blood-brain barrier (BBB): tight junctions (claudin-5, occludin, ZO-1) between brain capillary endothelial cells + astrocyte end-feet + pericytes. Excludes most polar/large molecules. Lipid-soluble drugs cross easily; selective transport for glucose (GLUT1), amino acids (LAT1), iron (transferrin receptor).

Microglial activation states

Spectrum, not strict binary:

NLRP3 inflammasome — CHIVERO research target

Two-signal activation model:

Signal 1 — Priming:

  1. Microglia detects DAMP/PAMP (HIV-Tat, LPS, ATP via P2X7, Aβ, α-synuclein).
  2. TLR4/MD2 (or IL-1R, TNFR) activates MyD88/IRAK/TRAF6 cascade.
  3. NF-κB translocates to nucleus.
  4. Transcribes pro-IL-1β, pro-IL-18, NLRP3 itself, gasdermin D.
  5. Cell now "primed" — has all components but NLRP3 not yet assembled.

Signal 2 — Activation:

  1. Second hit: K⁺ efflux (P2X7 opens), ROS, lysosomal damage (uric acid crystals), ATP release.
  2. NLRP3 oligomerizes via NACHT domain.
  3. NLRP3's PYD domain recruits ASC adapter via PYD-PYD interaction.
  4. ASC oligomerizes; CARD domain recruits procaspase-1 via CARD-CARD.
  5. Procaspase-1 self-cleaves → active caspase-1.
  6. Caspase-1 cleaves: pro-IL-1β → mature IL-1β; pro-IL-18 → mature IL-18; gasdermin D → GSDMD-N.
  7. GSDMD-N inserts into plasma membrane → forms ~10-nm pores.
  8. Pores release cytokines + cause membrane rupture → pyroptosis (lytic inflammatory cell death).
  9. Released IL-1β + IL-18 amplify neuroinflammation in surrounding tissue.

HIV-Tat in CNS — Chivero focus

HIV-1 produces Tat (Trans-activator of transcription) — a small RNA-binding viral protein essential for viral gene expression. Even on suppressive ART, latent reservoirs continue to produce some Tat. Tat:

Methamphetamine + microglia (Chivero focus)

Meth crosses BBB (lipophilic), enters dopaminergic neurons via DAT (reverses to release DA), and:

Astrocyte tripartite synapse

Astrocyte processes ensheath synapses on both sides. Functions:

Reactive astrocytosis

After CNS injury or chronic disease, astrocytes upregulate GFAP, hypertrophy, and form a glial scar. Two phenotypes (Liddelow + Barres 2017):

Microglial synaptic pruning

Microglia phagocytose synapses tagged with complement (C1q, C3). Critical in development (refining circuits — visual cortex eye-specific layers). Aberrant in:

astrocyteoligodendrocytemicroglia (yolk-sac origin)ependymal cellBBB (claudin-5)EAAT1/EAAT2tripartite synapseglutamate-glutamine cycleM1 vs M2 microgliaNLRP3 inflammasomesignal 1 primingsignal 2 activationcaspase-1IL-1β / IL-18gasdermin DpyroptosisHIV-TatHANDmethamphetamine + DAreactive astrocytosis A1/A2complement pruningTREM2
Chivero exam target. Be ready to walk through NLRP3 two-signal activation in detail. Know HOW HIV-Tat + meth synergize: Tat = Signal 1 priming via TLR4; meth provides Signal 2 via K⁺ efflux + ROS. Pyroptosis = gasdermin D pores. This is Chivero's published research — expect multiple exam questions.

Ch 14Pharmacology + Drugs of Abuse

Big idea. Most psychoactive drugs act on synaptic transmission — agonizing or antagonizing receptors, blocking reuptake, modulating release. The mesolimbic dopamine pathway (VTA → NAc) is the final common reward circuit activated by virtually all addictive drugs.

Mesolimbic DA reward pathway: VTA → nucleus accumbens (NAc) + PFC + amygdala. DA release in NAc signals "this is rewarding, repeat it." Activated by food, sex, social bonding, AND every addictive drug.

Drug mechanisms (key ones for NEUR 1520):

Tolerance: reduced response after repeated exposure. Pharmacodynamic (receptor downregulation) + pharmacokinetic (CYP450 induction). Sensitization: increased response with repeated psychomotor stimulant exposure (locomotor activity in rodents).

Addiction circuits: VTA → NAc + amygdala + PFC. Loss of top-down PFC control + amygdala dysregulation + sensitized DA response = addiction. Modern view emphasizes anti-reward systems (CRF, dynorphin) in withdrawal.

Methods in neuroscience

mesolimbic DAVTA → NAccocaine (DAT block)methamphetamine (DAT reverse)opioids (μ agonist)alcohol (GABA_A + NMDA)nicotine (nAChR)THC (CB1)5-HT2A hallucinogensbenzodiazepines (GABA_A PAM)tolerancesensitizationEEG / fMRI / PETpatch clampoptogenetics ChR2/NpHRDREADDsGCaMP